Tattoos
VS. Other Body Art
These days, it is not uncommon for tattoos to be associated with other
forms of body art. In many areas, especially larger cities, tattoo studios
are no longer solely tattoo studios, as they also offer piercings. In
combining these two, two issues frequently arise. First, while many people
consider tasteful, well-done tattoos to be a legitimate form of self-expression
through artwork, a large number in this category also consider body piercing
to be unacceptable; or, at the very least, undesirable. It is difficult
to communicate this to young people, especially teenagers, when an increasing
number of tattoo studios also offer body piercing. Kids will naturally
assume that if artwork is acceptable, acquiring holes and rings in various
parts of their anatomies should also be acceptable.
A second important issue regarding this subject is that while states
generally have strict regulations surrounding tattoos, that is not always
the case with body piercing. Even when tattooing is strictly regulated
to the extent that minors cannot be tattooed, or, in some states, requiring
the parent's consent for the process, it is becoming an increasing problem
in some areas that body piercing carries no such requirements.
There are a couple of serious repercussions to this fact. First, many
parents rightfully consider it to be a violation of parental rights to
find that "piercing artists" can undermine their parental authority by
putting piercings in their under-aged kids, not only without a parent's
consent but without their knowledge in advance.
Second, in the areas where this can legally be done, there is also the
issue of health standards. While the general rule is that a person is
presented with risk factors in writing prior to getting a tattoo, piercing
artists often allow minors to sign health waivers; although this is illegal,
it is sometimes done anyway.
This opens up a whole "can of worms" with both legal and health issues.
Legally, minors cannot sign such forms; but the health aspect of it is
also worth noting. As body piercing carries much higher and more frequent
risks of infection than tattoos, in signing these health waivers the teenager
is rarely aware of how significant these risk factors actually are. While
the risk of infection from body piercing is high enough in general, it
can become even more so depending on the location of the piercing. Having
piercings done in areas that are normally exposed to saliva, or airborne
dirt, is simply asking for trouble. Yet piercing artists are often more
concerned about making money than they are about the potential health
repercussions to their young clients.
In addition to these factors, there is also the factor of social stigma.
While youngsters may be accurate in assuming that acquiring body piercings
will impress their teenage or other immature friends, it is not likely
that it will impress anyone else. Even if they withstand parental objections,
and ignore the dismay of school staff and employers, they have yet to
see that body piercings generally do not go over very well in "the real
world."
Whether one is most concerned with the potential health risks of body
piercing, or the general consensus of the American population, body piercing
has a long way to go before it is considered an acceptable practice. Tattoos
carry some degree of valid purpose; in the opinion of most American adults,
body piercing has no value other than for its owner to appear less than
respectable.
|